REIGN OF TERROR:
1) Explain in a paragraph or two, what happened in
France following the execution of King Louis.
2) What were the main causes of the ‘Reign of Terror’?
3) Approximately what percentage of those guillotined
were nobles and clergy?
4) Look at sources 1 – 5 and at the information on the
Committee for Public Safety. Do you think the system of Tribunals in France was
fair? Explain why, giving examples from each source.
5)
Using sources 4 and 5, and the
information on the Terror continuing, what examples of particular ‘horrors’ are
there? Explain at least 3, in full.
6) How and why do you think the Terror came to an end?
7) Was Robespierre to blame for the Terror? Answer in a
short paragraph, using the sources, the information and the fact file on
Robespierre.
1. After the execution of King Louis, society was divided
into two groups: the JACOBINS who were a radical sort of French revolutionary
and the GIRONDINS, who were moderate sort of French revolutionary. In February,
it was clear that the war was still going badly for France. And in March, there
was a peasant revolt in Vendee, in the northwest. In August, the Jacobins
declared that ‘Terror is the order of the day’. By the late summer, many areas
of France were rebelling against the new radical Jacobin government.
2. The main causes of the reign of terror were that
people was obsessed with the anti-revolution feeling so thousands of people were
suspected of anti-revolutionary activities or of helping France’s enemies. All
of them were sent to the guillotine even if there was no evidence to accuse
them.
3. The guillotined nobles and clergy were about the 14%
of all the guillotined people.
4. The committee for public safety was not totally fair
because all the people accused of being traitors were condemned to death
without a trial. And many of the executed people may have been innocent.
Jacobins were blind because of the fear of the anti-revolutionary feelings and
because people could plot against them.
5.
·
Marie
Plaisant was executed for having exclaimed that she did not care about for the
nation. It was really unfair that they killed her since people should have
freedom to express their opinions.
·
Henriette
Francoise Marboeuf, aged 55, convicted of having hoped for the arrival of the
Austrians and Prussians and of keeping food for them, condemned to death and
executed the same day. His death was unjust because there was no proof of their
hopes of an Austrian invasion.
·
Francois
Bertrand, aged37, publican, convicted of having provided the defenders of the
country with sour wine, condemned and executed the same day. She may have had
good intentions to help others so she did not deserve death.
6. The terror came
to an end because the Jacobin’s major fear was an Austrian invasion and when
they saw that the threat of an invasion decreased, they stopped accusing
people. They saw the need for the emergency government.
7. I think that Robespierre was guilty for the terror
because as a leader he authorized the execution of thousands of people that
could have been innocent. He had a quite contradictory policy. And after all he
received the same condemn as the rest of people had.
tysm this helped a lot
ResponderEliminarGracias
ResponderEliminarActually this answers are very helpful for me thanku
Eliminarthnks
Eliminar