|
During the 18th century, riots were frequent
all throughout England. Several of these riots occurred for different reasons,
some of them occurred as a result of how bad things were in this period for the
English people. Those riots had a profound effect on the economy in the 18th
century. Rising food prices, various protests and actions taken are the main
causes why so many riots occurred and they really played a big role in
regulating the economy at that time.
To
begin with, the majority of riots in the eighteenth century were a result of
people in England that were upset and angry because the food prices were too
high, much of the lower and middle class were affected by this. They also complained about the terrible
conditions in which they lived. People were tired of the English economic
system and this generated a feeling of violence among people caused by despair
and greed. People decided to start burning the crops as a symbol of rebellion
and looting shops because they were starving. They also destructed public
places and the peasants attacked the landowners’ houses. All these riots were
enhanced by a group of citizens known as the mob. The mob defied the law and
they took measures to bring a change to England.
Furthermore, the riots carried out by the mob
caused a lot of trouble for the English authorities since the “new towns” were
still small villages, which lacked parish constables to keep the order among
people. However, some larger towns such as London, Bristol and Liverpool had
resident justices who were allowed to read the Riot Act. It was an Act of the Parliament of Great Britain that authorized local authorities to declare any group of twelve or more
people to be unlawfully assembled, and thus have to disperse or face punitive
action. The Act, whose long title was "An Act for preventing
tumults and riotous assemblies, and for the more speedy and effectual punishing
the rioters", came into force on 1 August 1715. If a group of
people failed to disperse within one hour of the proclamation, the Act provided
that the authorities could use force to disperse them. Anyone assisting with
the dispersal was specifically indemnified against any legal consequences in
the event of any of the crowd being injured or killed.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario